PublicationsPublicaties
Peer-reviewed publicationsPeer-reviewed publicaties
2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021
Working PapersWorking Papers

Pre-prints and papers under review. Pre-prints en papers onder review.

Inclusive selectorates, unrepresentative candidate lists? On inclusivity versus representativeness in candidate selection processes Inclusive selectorates, unrepresentative candidate lists? On inclusivity versus representativeness in candidate selection processes
Rozemarijn van Dijk
Forthcoming, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties (JEPOP) Forthcoming, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties (JEPOP)
Candidate selection procedures are often cited as a reason for the underrepresentation of women. This article focuses on the role of party members, who have become more influential as candidate selection procedures have grown more inclusive. While theory often assumes a negative relationship between inclusivity and representativeness, empirical findings are mixed. Using a ranked conjoint experiment among Dutch party members, this study examines how party members evaluate and rank candidates under different selection settings. I find no evidence that more inclusive selection procedures lead to less gender-balanced candidate lists. Party members show a preference for women candidates but place even greater weight on incumbency and party activity. As access to these resources remains unequally distributed, women still face an indirect disadvantage in candidate selection. Candidate selection procedures are often cited as a reason for the underrepresentation of women. This article focuses on the role of party members, who have become more influential as candidate selection procedures have grown more inclusive. While theory often assumes a negative relationship between inclusivity and representativeness, empirical findings are mixed. Using a ranked conjoint experiment among Dutch party members, this study examines how party members evaluate and rank candidates under different selection settings. I find no evidence that more inclusive selection procedures lead to less gender-balanced candidate lists. Party members show a preference for women candidates but place even greater weight on incumbency and party activity. As access to these resources remains unequally distributed, women still face an indirect disadvantage in candidate selection.
Mobilizing or demobilizing? A factorial survey experiment on violence against politicians and citizens' political participation Mobiliserend of demobiliserend? Een factorieel surveyexperiment over geweld tegen politici en burgerparticipatie
Rozemarijn van Dijk, J. van Lit
Pre-print available · Under review Pre-print beschikbaar · Onder review
Pre-print 🏆 Best Paper Award, ECPR Standing Group on Political Violence · 2025Best Paper Award, ECPR Standing Group on Political Violence · 2025
Dutch Election StudiesKiezersonderzoek

Non-peer-reviewed contributions to the Dutch Parliamentary Election Study (NKO/SKON). Niet peer-reviewed bijdragen aan het Nationaal Kiezersonderzoek (NKO/SKON).

Perceptions of party division among voters Kiezerspercepties van partijverdeeldheid OngoingLopend
Rozemarijn van Dijk, R. van Well
NKO (Dutch Parliamentary Election Study) · 2025 NKO (Nationaal Kiezersonderzoek) · 2025
Verruwing in de politiek: hoe kiezers conflict en geweld in de politiek ervaren
Rozemarijn van Dijk, E.S. van der Goot, Z. Runderkamp, E.M. Turkenburg, C. Vargiu
In: De verkiezingen van 2023: 'Van Onderstroom naar Doorbraak: Onvrede en Migratie', pp. 46–54. Stichting KiezersOnderzoek Nederland (SKON), 2024. In: De verkiezingen van 2023: 'Van Onderstroom naar Doorbraak: Onvrede en Migratie', pp. 46–54. Stichting KiezersOnderzoek Nederland (SKON), 2024.